insisted upon; and the very dogmatic opinions asserted; must be examined。 At no time so much as
in our own; have such general principles and notions been advanced; or with greater assurance。 If
in days gone by; history seems to present itself as a struggle of passions; in our time — though
displays of passion are not wanting — it exhibits partly a predominance of the struggle of notions
assuming the authority of principles; partly that of passions and interests essentially subjective; but
under the mask of such higher sanctions。 The pretensions thus contended for as legitimate in the
name of that which has been stated as the ultimate aim of Reason; pass accordingly; for absolute
aims; — to the same extent as Religion; Morals; Ethics。 Nothing; as before remarked; is now more
mon than the plaint that the ideals which imagination sets up are not realised — that these
glorious dreams are destroyed by cold actuality。 These Ideals — which in the voyage of life
founder on the rocks of hard reality — may be in the first instance only subjective; and belong to
the idiosyncrasy of the individual; imagining himself the highest and wisest。 Such do not properly
belong to this category。 For the fancies which the individual in his isolation indulges; cannot be the
model for universal reality; just as universal law is not designed for the units of the mass。 These as
such may; in fact; find their interests decidedly thrust into the background。 But by the term
“Ideal;” we also understand the ideal of Reason; of the Good; of the True。 Poets; as e。g。
Schiller; have painted such ideals touchingly and with strong emotion; and with the deeply
melancholy conviction that they could not be realised。 In affirming; on the contrary that the
Universal Reason does realise itself; we leave indeed nothing to do with the individual empirically
regarded。 That admits of degrees of better and worse; since here chance and speciality have
received authority from the Idea to exercise their monstrous power。 Much; therefore; in particular
aspects of the grand phenomenon might be found fault with。 This subjective fault…finding; — which;
however; only keeps in view the individual and its deficiency; without taking notice of Reason
pervading the whole; — is easy; and inasmuch as it asserts an excellent intention with regard to the
good of the whole; and seems to result from a kindly heart; it feels authorised to give itself airs and
assume great consequence。 It is easier to discover a deficiency in individuals; in states; and in
Providence; than to see their real import and value。 For in this merely negative fault…finding a
proud position is taken; — one which overlooks the object; without having entered into it; —
without having prehended its positive aspect。 Age generally makes men more tolerant; youth is
always discontented。 The tolerance of age is the result of the ripeness of a judgment which; … not
merely as the result of indifference; is satisfied even with what is inferior; but; more deeply taught
by the grave experience of life; has been led to perceive the substantial; solid worth of the object
in question。 The insight then to which — in contradistinction from those ideals — philosophy is to
lead us; is; that the real world is as it ought to be — that the truly good — the universal divine
reason — is not a mere abstraction; but a vital principle capable of realising itself。 This Good; this
Reason; in its most concrete form; is God。 God governs the world; the actual working of his
government — the carrying out of his plan — is the History of the World。 This plan philosophy
strives to prehend; for only that which has been developed as the result of it; possesses bona
fide reality。 That which does not accord with it; is negative; worthless existence。 Before the pure
light of this divine Idea — which is no mere Idea … the phantom of a world whose events are an